Staffsknot

Has he just tried to tell me to do my research & disputed what I said by actually then making the argument I made? Is he that stupid? "not realising the healthy stuff costs more than the smart price sugar filled stuff" - my post "I would dispute that fresh fruit and vegetables are rather cheap compared to the Gunk processed rubbish, maybe take a look next time your in a supermarket. " - ranty man who doesn't read properly @Bob8 there seems to be an epidemic of this at the moment

There are lots of people who have nothing left - inflation is burning any benefit from saving and making the thing they might have bought more expensive. Not a great argument to save. People who can save often do but this 'people haven't saved' myopic view of the problem is just looking down on people struggling like its their fault - in most cases it isn't its the economic realities Financialisation has pushed prices up and more % of incomes has been hoovered up in basics. You might just find lots of those people have saved all they can

I'm guessing by Insane straddling these comments he is one such individual. Let me guess thinks fresh is cheaper than smart price or no doubt shouting about grow your own... That's why he's on ignore as that's the level he's at. I've just seen his actual reply in byron's post - he just tried to dispute what I said by saying the same as me - suggest he does basic reading and comprehension before lecturing about do your research

Replies such as They should cut back and buy smart label stuff or yellow stickers Then in the next breath they will be kicking off about obesity not realising the healthy stuff costs more than the smart price sugar filled stuff.

By not having a choice... People don't always have a choice to save up 6 months wages you know, life sometimes gets in the way

No he has pushed Crypto and BTC - work in financial services have seen it and his attempts to get Crypto / BTC adopt so I have my facts right. He is a prominant individual and via Twitter pushes it. There's numerous articles about how his Tweets move the price and his pushing Tesla to adopt it as payment surged prices He's pushing Doge as yet another Crypto to hype. If you don't like the facts that he helped push the price from $30k to its high then you don't understand what moves that gambling investment. It isn't coin mining its people farming. Example https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/01/29/bitcoin-spikes-20percent-after-elon-musk-adds-bitcoin-to-his-twitter-bio.html I mean its not hard to see his ramping I'm surprised you had a hard time grasping it

How would you cope without topless girls to oggle, you'd have to just continue making crap comments about Muslims being forced to wear something while their other halves sit in Speedos, then backpeddle. Just an observation

Given your posts are generally an imitation of a Harry Enfield character its not surprising you don't get it tbh

No it was gambling before he hyped it to the moon and still is

Post of the day

Looks like Elon has ditched Bitcoin and screwed all those he told to HODL... Revealed Tesla ditched 75% of its Bitcoin investments and bought... regular currencies instead.

Ah the desperate I will ignore you but come back again. It wasn't just rural poor - again simplification by simplistic people. Read your own wiki link and some facts - it included IT workers, office workers, city dwellers. It combined many disparate groups and it was about inequality and - for anti-green protest they came out with green protestors in 2019 to protest about climate. Your pretence it is about reaction to green policies and not reaction to Macron's pro-business and inequality is undone by the wiki entry and lots of other sources. Once again you blow up by your own twisting crap to suit and it going tits. Diesels are popular in all of France due to 2 things - French manufacturers had a big stake in diesel production and the tax loophole that meant diesel was much cheaper than petrol. Diesels outnumbered petrol cars. Peugeot and Renault made loads domestically. It wasn't just rural people kicking off there were fleet owners, small businesses and truckers in the strike. The initial call of the Gilets Jaunes was the fuel rise was to pay for rich people's tax cuts by Macron. It was not seen as a green policy they believed that was Macron seizing on a way to get tax to fund his inequality! Its even in your bloody link. Ahem "While some commentators have claimed that the movement was a backlash to policies meant to combat climate change,[116][117] a communique released by the movement calls for a "real ecological policy", including fuel and kerosene taxes for ships and airplanes, but objects to policies like the gas tax that hit the poor and working class most heavily.[118][119]" All these facts bypass you as you made the statement it was a protest about anti-green and it made you look stupid as it was all about inequality and burden of taxes. Unless of course you now know better than the actual protestors and want to claim the thing you posted as evidence you were right is now wrong too. Like I said skim reader. Now once again - I caught you lying about things you'd said about canals you'd denied that I could quote verbatim back and did, you claimed I didn't know who Hugenberg was and I'd copied and pasted from Wikipedia.. despite all my posts having spelt his name wrong and me saying he was just an idiot who called an election thinking he'd win and was deeply unpopular, the real power brokers and blame lay with Von Papen and Hindenberg who thought they could control Hitler and who intensely disliked Hugenberg. You claimed otherwise, I quoted it back and you stormed off in a huff as others pointed out you were bang out of order again. But again you don't like facts and this is your nature to scream and shout and try and deflect from your own inability to read even the things in front of you that you posted or acknowledge your statement When your own article is they weren't against green policy they were against ******ing inequality and where taxes were falling vs big business getting off / tax cuts. Again they had 42 demands with the fuel tax repeal only 1. Minimum wages, reversal of tax cuts and green opt outs for big business were two more. Now either learn to read your own damn links and stop ranting like a clown and making stuff up / denying you've said it or stick me on ignore so you can live in blissful ignorance everytime you pull your disingenuous routine and moan about being called out then make stuff up. For the abscence of doubt Ludovsky the original petition poster and the person who setup the first protest calls is an environmentalist and inequality campaigner. Just another fact you missed

Again you are a myopic waste of everyone's time. I called out violations of Geneva Convention by both sides and argued with people on here advocating it was fone for one side or the other. You have frequently made false claims and denied one sides abuses then pushed the others. You are as myopicly one sided as they come so royally Foxtrot Oscar with your demands. You don't like being proven to have swallowed propaganda hook line & sinker time and again and are quite literally worthless from an information PoV. Remember how many fake news items you have pushed including the hospital attacks that you said never happened or were crisis actors. You lack any objectivity and just recycle whatever you find that you think pushes Russian position forward. Its not even decent trolling

Right if its between two internal factions its a civil war, if its between external parties its not. So no it can't be both. Just like it can't not be an invasion if the LPR and DPR are assisting Russia outside those regions or nicking bits from areas that didn't want to be part of the breakaway really. Again inconvenient facts. Mariupol is in Donetsk Oblast and vast majority did not want to be part of breakaway nor actively support it. In fact if memory serves in 2014 local workers kicked DPR activists out when they tried to take it over.

I post accurate info and condemn ******** merchants on both sides of this, which is why you don't like it as most of your posts are of that variety Just like I called out wild claims from other side of argument. You just post guff and don't like being called on it